ITAT Bengaluru withdraws tax order citing fake AI judgments

The ITAT Bengaluru withdrew a tax order involving Buckeye Trust after discovering it relied on fake legal precedents generated by AI. The incident highlights the risk of using generative AI for legal research without rigorous verification.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bengaluru · Incident Dec 1, 2024 · Indexed Jun 8, 2026 · 2 sources

The tribunal incorporated fabricated AI-generated case laws into a formal ruling without performing due diligence.
What
The ITAT Bengaluru withdrew a tax order involving Buckeye Trust after discovering it relied on fake legal precedents generated by AI.
Incident date
Dec 1, 2024
Who
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bengaluru
Failure mode
Hallucination
AI surface
Chatbot
Severity
Medium

What happened

The Bengaluru bench of the ITAT released a tax order that cited four non-existent precedents (three from the Supreme Court and one from the Madras High Court). The order was withdrawn within about a week after it became clear the precedents did not exist in legal records. It is alleged that a generative AI tool was used to find favorable verdicts and these results were incorporated without due verification.

What broke inside the model

Failure path · mode profile · Hallucination
  1. 01 · TriggerA user asks for a fact, a citation, or a figure.
  2. 02 · Model stepThe model writes a fluent, confident answer.
  3. 03 · Control gapNothing ties the claim back to a real source.
  4. 04 · FailureA fabricated fact ships as if it were verified.
  5. 05 · ConsequenceThe false claim reaches a customer, a court, or the public.

Confidence holds, and even spikes, as the claim detaches from any source.

A generative AI tool hallucinated plausible-sounding but entirely fictitious legal citations and case names. This failure was exacerbated by a lack of human verification as the tribunal bench accepted these hallucinations as legal precedent.

Public visibilityHigh
Regulatory exposureActive
Customer impactFew customers
Financial impactUnknown
Time to disclosureDays
  1. PressDid AI hallucination play mischief with a tax tribunal order?livemint.com
  2. PressITAT Retracts Order After AI-Generated Fake Judgements in Buckeye Trust Tax Casebhaskarenglish.in
Permalinkhttps://failureindex.ai/failures/itat-bengaluru-withdraws-tax-order-citing
CitationAI Failure Index. "ITAT Bengaluru withdraws tax order citing fake AI judgments" (FI-0313). Realm Labs. https://failureindex.ai/failures/itat-bengaluru-withdraws-tax-order-citing (indexed Jun 8, 2026).
Share cardA branded image of this record for posts and slides.

Data fields CC-BY 4.0, prose citation permitted. Incident ID FI-0313. Full dataset at /data.

Note from Realm Labs, the Index steward

How Realm would have caught this

Controls for this failure mode
  • Prism
  • OmniGuard
  • AI Detection & Response (AIDR)

A runtime layer that watches the model's internal state can flag the moment a model commits to a claim it has no support for, and hold or reroute the response before it reaches a user. Realm reads those signals in real time rather than grading the transcript after the fact.